QualityDip
Get alerts
Prices as of Tue 5:00 pm ET

Stocks / Industrials · Aggregates & minerals

LEU

Centrus Energy LEU

Industrials · Aggregates & minerals
$94.90−8.12% dayMon Nov 2 close

Outside our quality screen, so we don’t track its dips. It’s 74% below its 52-week high.

Outside our quality screen, 10% under its Market Value. No fair value estimate for now: its free cash flow is negative.

Worth knowing

  • Net cash = 36% of its market cap
  • Deepest drop from a 52-week high in over 3 years

From the data on this page, as of the last close. How we pick these

Outside our quality screenReports Nov 4
Get alerts
Fair value est.
n/a
Market Value
$105.91price −10%
Off 52-wk high
−74%
Risk vs market
Highbeta 3.56

52-week range at its 52-week low

Low $94.90High $367.46

Price $94.90Market Value $105.91

5 bullish · 5 bearish See why

Covered for reference — doesn’t pass our quality screen (market cap $1.9B, under our $20B floor; no positive free cash flow). We show its price, Market Value and DCF, but it never appears in Dips, Top Picks or reversal signals. The screen

Repriced or dip?

Repricing: business changed

28/100

The price is 74% below its 52-week high, and the business changed too: earnings per share −58.1%, free cash flow $107M → −$164M, turned negative, operating margin −19.4 pts.

The evidence 10 numbers, high vs now
  • Revenue, last 12 months$437M → $474M (+8.5%)held up
  • Revenue growth rate+12.7% → +8.5% a year (−4.3 pts)changed
  • Earnings per share, 12 months$5.78 → $2.42 (−58.1%)changed
  • Free cash flow, 12 months$107M → −$164M, turned negativechanged
  • Operating margin20.9% → 1.6% (−19.4 pts)changed
  • Shares outstanding+10.5% (more shares, each owns less)changed
  • Net cash (cash minus debt)+13.1% of market cap since the highheld up
  • Stock vs its sector (Industrials)stock −74%, sector median +11% since Oct 31changed
  • Price fall vs business numbersprice −74%, revenue/EPS/FCF median −25% (shown, not scored)
  • Valuation multipleP/E 63.5× at the high → 39.2× now (shown, not scored)

Business numbers as reported at the high (12 months to Jun 30, 2025) vs the latest filing (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). Each measure is scored from −1 (business changed) to +1 (business intact) and weighted: revenue, earnings per share, free cash flow, operating margin, revenue growth rate, share count, net cash and the move vs its sector. 60 or more reads as a dip, 40 or less as a repricing. Analyst estimates are not in our data, so they are not used. How to read it

Data-based read, not advice.

Priced in

How much growth the market assumed at the 52-week high, the low and today (a reverse DCF).

At the high ($367.46, Oct 31) the price assumed about 28%/yr free-cash-flow growth. The last 3 years delivered 16%/yr (free cash flow).

  • 52-wk high$367.46+28%
  • 52-wk lown/a
  • Nown/a

Dashed line: what the last 3 years delivered, 16%/yr (free cash flow)

HighLowNow
Price$367.46Oct 31$94.90Nov 2$94.90
Implied growth+28%n/an/a
P/E63.5×42.8×39.2×
P/FCF62.5×——
EV/Sales14.2×2.9×2.6×

What this means: the higher the implied growth, the more the price already counts on. If today's number sits well below what the business has delivered, the market expects less than its track record.

How it’s computed

Reverse DCF: the same 10-year free-cash-flow model as our fair value estimate (9.5% discount rate, growth for years 1–5 fading to 3% by year 10, 3% after), solved for the growth that makes it equal the market value at each price. For the high and the low we use only the filings that were public on that day, so nothing from a later report leaks back. Market value = that close × diluted shares. P/E = market value / 12-month net income; Price / FCF = market value / 12-month free cash flow; EV / Sales = (market value + debt − cash) / 12-month revenue. Hidden when the share count moved over 20% (split, merger), free cash flow is negative, or the company reports in another currency.

Valuation

What we estimate it's worth, and how it ranks on value vs every stock we cover.

Fair value estimate

No estimate for LEU: negative free cash flow. We’d rather show nothing than a made-up number.

Risk vs market

How risk vs market is measured

One year of daily returns (Oct 31 to Nov 2, 252 sessions). Beta = how much LEU moved for each 1% move in the S&P 500 (SPY); 1.0 moves with the market. Volatility is the yearly standard deviation of daily returns. Past behavior, not a forecast.

High

Swings much more than the market, and its own price swings are 6.7× the S&P 500’s.

Beta vs S&P 500
3.56
Volatility
86% vs 13% SPY
Correlation SPY
0.53
Correlation QQQ
0.57

How it ranks

Where LEU stands vs every one of the 2,467 stocks we cover that has the number. Longer bar = better.

Not in the top quarter on any of these 5 measures

  1. Free cash flow yield−8.6% · free cash flow vs market cap
    Lowest 5%of 1,690
  2. Dividends + buybacks yield0% · cash paid out or used to retire shares, vs market cap
    Lowest 1%of 2,227
  3. Revenue growth, last 12 months+8.5% · vs the 12 months before
    Lowest 46%of 2,184
  4. Operating margin1.6% · of sales kept as operating profit
    Lowest 18%of 1,549
  5. Return on invested capital4.8% · profit per dollar of capital
    Lowest 26%of 1,001

From SEC filings and our fair value estimate model. A ranking, not advice.

Valuation details

MV $105.91

How

Market ValueAverage paid since the Oct 19 filing, 11 trading days
$105.91price −10%
Fair value estimaten/a — negative free cash flow
n/a
FCF valueTrailing free cash flow is negative
n/a

Fundamentals

The business itself: sales, profits, cash and debt, from SEC filings.

Bull vs bear

Rule-based from the data on this page, strongest first. Not advice.

Top bullish points 5 of 5

  1. Balance sheetNet cash of $691M: cash and short-term investments exceed debt (Jun 30, 2026).

  2. GrowthSales compounded 15% a year from FY2022 to FY2025.

  3. GrowthSales grew 8% to $474M over the last 12 months vs the 12 months before (SEC filings).

  4. ValuationPrice / book of 2.2×, below the 3.3× median for the 274 Industrials companies we cover.

  5. ValuationTrades 10.4% below its Market Value of $105.91, the average price paid since the Oct 19 filing.

Top bearish points 5 of 5

  1. ValuationFree cash flow is negative (−$164M over the last 12 months), so there’s no cash-flow value under the price.

  2. Balance sheetOperating income covers interest only 0.5× over the last 12 months.

  3. ProfitabilityReturn on equity fell 251 points in two fiscal years, to 10% in FY2025.

  4. Balance sheetDebt rose 1211% to $1.2B from FY2023 to FY2025.

  5. QualityDoesn’t pass our quality screen: no positive free cash flow.

All fundamentals

P/E 39.2 · FCF yield -8.6% · ROE 8%

Valuation

P/E
39.2×Industrials median 26.3×
Price / FCF
n/anegative free cash flow
FCF yield
−8.6%
EV / EBITDA
71.1×
Price / sales
4.01×
Price / book
2.25×
Market cap
$1.9Blisted
Enterprise value
$1.2B

Growth

Revenue, 12 months
$474M
Sales growth, 12 months
+8.5%vs the 12 months before
Sales growth, 3 yrs
+15.2%/yrfrom FY2022
Diluted EPS, 12 months
$1.89
EPS growth, last FY
−12.8%
Net income, 12 months
$48M
Net income growth
−54%12 months vs before

Profitability

Gross margin
23.7%
Operating margin
1.6%
Net margin
10.2%
FCF margin
−34.6%
Return on equity
8%
Return on invested capital
5%

Balance sheet

Cash & short-term inv.
$1.9B
Total debt
$1.2B
Net cash
$691M
Debt / equity
1.39×
Interest coverage
0.5×operating income / interest

Cash flow & returns

Free cash flow, 12 months
−$164M
FCF growth, 12 months
n/anot reported in its SEC filings
Dividend yield
0%
Payout ratio
n/anot reported in its SEC filings
Buybacks, 12 months
n/anot reported in its SEC filings
Share count, 1 year
+20.8%diluted shares vs a year ago
Stock-based comp
n/anot reported in its SEC filings

Trailing 12 months to Jun 30, 2026; balance sheet at Jun 30, 2026. From Centrus Energy’s SEC filings. Sparklines show up to six fiscal years. n/a means we don’t hold that number, with the reason. How each is computed.

The business

FCF $-0.1B · Sales +14%
  • Free cash flow, 12 months−$0.1B
  • Free-cash-flow yield-8.6%
  • Free-cash-flow margin−27%
  • Gross margin24%
  • Operating margin5%
  • Return on invested capital14%
  • Return on equity8%
  • Sales growth (latest quarter vs year-ago quarter)+14%
  • Net debt / EBITDA−68.4×

Chart & levels

Where the price is vs its key levels and trends.

$100$200$300Jan ’26AprJulOctMV $105.91
Market ValueDrag across the chart to see any day

Key levels

Every level vs today’s $94.90

  1. PriceMon Nov 2 close$94.90you are here
  2. 52-wk lowlowest close, 1 year$94.90at the price
  3. Market Valueavg paid since Oct 19$105.91+11.6%
  4. 52-wk highhighest close, 1 year$367.46+287.2%

Momentum & 52-week range

RSI 30 · 5 days −3.6%
$94.90nowMV
52-wk low $94.90high $367.46
Off 52-wk high−74.2%
5 days−3.6%
vs 50-day avg−33.8%
vs 200-day avg−48.5%
RSI (14), last close30
Market cap$2B

Signals

Reversal signal setups, the public ledger and the next earnings date.

Setup & signals

No setup armed

All setups

No setup armed, so there’s no trigger or stop to track yet. Reversal signal rules only run on companies that pass our quality screen.

Next report

Nov 4

Calendar

  • DateWed Nov 4, after the close
  • Consensus EPS($0.36)
  • Year-ago EPS$0.19
  • QuarterSep/2026

From Nasdaq’s earnings calendar. A report resets Market Value.

LEU is outside our quality screen

One text when a published rule fires on one of the 332 quality companies we track: the ticker, the price, the stop and a link to the numbers. Nothing else.

By joining you agree we can text or email you about QualityDip. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP anytime. Not advice.

Voices & buzz

Who is talking about it, and how it compares with peers.

Who’s talking about it

Notable investors, executives, analysts and public figures on Centrus Energy in the last 48 hours. Headlines as published, each linked. Their words, not ours.

No notable mentions in the last 48 hours. Checked Nov 3, 5:14 PM ET.

Compare with peers

Closest in size in Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)

Information only, not investment advice. Fair value estimates and talking points are rule-based model output from public data and can be wrong; stop levels are reference points, not orders. How every number is computed.