Stocks / Real Estate · REITs
Independence Realty Trust IRT
Outside our quality screen, so we don’t track its dips. It’s 16% below its 52-week high.
Outside our quality screen. No fair value estimate for now: there isn’t enough data.
- Fair value est.
- n/a
- Market Value
- $14.72price +2%
- Off 52-wk high
- −16%
- Risk vs market
- Lowbeta 0.19
4 bullish · 5 bearish See why
Repriced or dip?
Dip: business intact
The price is 16% below its 52-week high (Dec 30), but the business held up: revenue growth rate +2.6 pts, earnings per share +95.1%, shares outstanding fewer shares, each owns more.
Some numbers held up (revenue growth rate +2.6 pts, earnings per share +95.1%, shares outstanding fewer shares, each owns more), others slipped. The price is 16% below its 52-week high.
The price is 16% below its 52-week high, and the business changed too.
Within 10% of its 52-week high, so there is no dip to judge yet.
The evidence 8 numbers, high vs now
- Revenue, last 12 months$652M → $667M (+2.3%)held up
- Revenue growth rate+0.8% → +3.5% a year (+2.6 pts)held up
- Earnings per share, 12 months$0.10 → $0.19 (+95.1%)held up
- Shares outstanding0.0% (fewer shares, each owns more)held up
- Net cash (cash minus debt)−4.2% of market cap since the highabout the same
- Stock vs its sector (Real Estate)stock −16%, sector median +4% since Dec 30changed
- Price fall vs business numbersprice −16%, revenue/EPS/FCF median +49% (shown, not scored)
- Valuation multipleP/E 186.8× at the high → 80.5× now (shown, not scored)
Business numbers as reported at the high (12 months to Sep 30, 2025) vs the latest filing (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). Each measure is scored from −1 (business changed) to +1 (business intact) and weighted: revenue, earnings per share, free cash flow, operating margin, revenue growth rate, share count, net cash and the move vs its sector. 60 or more reads as a dip, 40 or less as a repricing. Analyst estimates are not in our data, so they are not used. How to read it
Data-based read, not advice.
Priced in
How much growth the market assumed at the 52-week high, the low and today (a reverse DCF).
52-wk high: P/E 186.8×; 52-wk low: P/E 78.4×; now: P/E 80.5×.
| High | Low | Now | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $17.77Dec 30 | $14.44Oct 7 | $14.94 |
| Implied growth | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| P/E | 186.8× | 78.4× | 80.5× |
| EV/Sales | 9.9× | 8.7× | 8.9× |
What this means: a lower P/E than at the high means you pay less for each dollar of profit than buyers did then.
How it’s computed
Reverse DCF: the same 10-year free-cash-flow model as our fair value estimate (9.5% discount rate, growth for years 1–5 fading to 3% by year 10, 3% after), solved for the growth that makes it equal the market value at each price. For the high and the low we use only the filings that were public on that day, so nothing from a later report leaks back. Market value = that close × diluted shares. P/E = market value / 12-month net income; Price / FCF = market value / 12-month free cash flow; EV / Sales = (market value + debt − cash) / 12-month revenue. Hidden when the share count moved over 20% (split, merger), free cash flow is negative, or the company reports in another currency.
Valuation
What we estimate it's worth, and how it ranks on value vs every stock we cover.
Fair value estimate
No estimate for IRT: Capital spending isn't tagged for the latest period in SEC XBRL data. We’d rather show nothing than a made-up number.
Risk vs market
How risk vs market is measured
One year of daily returns (Oct 31 to Nov 2, 252 sessions). Beta = how much IRT moved for each 1% move in the S&P 500 (SPY); 1.0 moves with the market. Volatility is the yearly standard deviation of daily returns. Past behavior, not a forecast.
Has moved mostly independently of the market, but its own price swings are 1.7× the S&P 500’s (it moves on its own news).
- Beta vs S&P 500
- 0.19
- Volatility
- 21% vs 13% SPY
- Correlation SPY
- 0.12
- Correlation QQQ
- −0.07
Valuation details
MV $14.72 · FCF value $20.28
Fundamentals
The business itself: sales, profits, cash and debt, from SEC filings.
Bull vs bear
Rule-based from the data on this page, strongest first. Not advice.
Top bullish points 4 of 5
GrowthDiluted EPS grew 41% to $0.24 in FY2025.
Cash returnsDividend yield of 4.6% ($161M paid over 12 months).
ValuationPrice / book of 1.0×, below the 2.0× median for the 85 Real Estate companies we cover.
Balance sheetDebt / equity of 0.7×, below the 0.9× median for the 53 Real Estate companies we cover.
Top bearish points 5 of 5
ValuationP/E of 80.5× vs a 25.9× median for the 80 Real Estate companies we cover.
Balance sheetNet debt of $2.4B, 69% of the market cap (Jun 30, 2026).
ProfitabilityReturn on equity is only 1% over the last 12 months.
GrowthSales grew only 1.5% a year from FY2022 to FY2025.
QualityDoesn’t pass our quality screen: ROE under 12% and ROIC under 10%; net debt 6.4× EBITDA (limit 3×).
All fundamentals
P/E 80.5 · ROE 1% · Sales +3%
Valuation
- P/E
- 80.5×Real Estate median 25.9×
- Price / FCF
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- FCF yield
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- EV / EBITDA
- n/aD&A or debt not tagged in SEC data
- Price / sales
- 5.25×
- Price / book
- 1.04×
- Market cap
- $3.5Blisted
- Enterprise value
- $5.9B
Growth
- Revenue, 12 months
- $667M
- Sales growth, 12 months
- +3.5%vs the 12 months before
- Sales growth, 3 yrs
- +1.5%/yrfrom FY2022
- Diluted EPS, 12 months
- $0.18
- EPS growth, last FY
- +41.2%
- Net income, 12 months
- $43M
- Net income growth
- +57%12 months vs before
Profitability
- Gross margin
- n/agross profit isn't reported (common for service and financial companies)
- Operating margin
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- Net margin
- 6.5%
- FCF margin
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- Return on equity
- 1%
- Return on invested capital
- n/aoperating income, debt, equity or cash not tagged
Balance sheet
- Cash & short-term inv.
- $23M
- Total debt
- $2.4B
- Net cash
- −$2.4B
- Debt / equity
- 0.73×
- Interest coverage
- n/ainterest expense not tagged in SEC data
Cash flow & returns
- Free cash flow, 12 months
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- FCF growth, 12 months
- n/anot reported in its SEC filings
- Dividend yield
- 4.60%$161M paid
- Payout ratio
- n/an/m
- Buybacks, 12 months
- $60M1.7% of market cap
- Share count, 1 year
- +0.8%diluted shares vs a year ago
- Stock-based comp
- $8M
Trailing 12 months to Jun 30, 2026; balance sheet at Jun 30, 2026. From Independence Realty Trust’s SEC filings. Sparklines show up to six fiscal years. n/a means we don’t hold that number, with the reason. How each is computed.
The business
FCF $0.2B · Sales +3%
- Free cash flow, 12 months$0.2B
- Free-cash-flow yield5.4%
- Free-cash-flow margin28%
- Gross margin61%
- Operating margin15%
- Return on invested capital1%
- Return on equity1%
- Sales growth (latest quarter vs year-ago quarter)+3%
- Net debt / EBITDA6.4×
Chart & levels
Where the price is vs its key levels and trends.
Key levels
Every level vs today’s $14.94
- 52-wk lowlowest close, 1 year$14.44−3.3%
- Market Valueavg paid since Sep 23$14.72−1.5%
- PriceMon Nov 2 close$14.94you are here
- 52-wk highhighest close, 1 year$17.77+18.9%
Momentum & 52-week range
RSI 51 · 5 days 0.0%
Signals
Reversal signal setups, the public ledger and the next earnings date.
Setup & signals
No setup armed
No setup armed, so there’s no trigger or stop to track yet. Reversal signal rules only run on companies that pass our quality screen.
IRT is outside our quality screen
One text when a published rule fires on one of the 332 quality companies we track: the ticker, the price, the stop and a link to the numbers. Nothing else.
Voices & buzz
Who is talking about it, and how it compares with peers.
Who’s talking about it
Notable investors, executives, analysts and public figures on Independence Realty Trust in the last 48 hours. Headlines as published, each linked. Their words, not ours.
No notable mentions in the last 48 hours. Checked Nov 3, 1:01 PM ET.
Compare with peers
Closest in size in REITs
Information only, not investment advice. Fair value estimates and talking points are rule-based model output from public data and can be wrong; stop levels are reference points, not orders. How every number is computed.